Post by account_disabled on Mar 3, 2024 22:41:21 GMT -5
Ivan Krastev, is one of the leading European thinkers on democracy, and author of books such as "Democracy Disrupted: The Politics of Global Protest". A regular columnist for The New York Times, Krastev directs the Center for Liberal Strategy in Bulgaria. In this interview, the renowned political scientist talks about what he considers to be the driving forces behind the rise of populism, extreme nationalism, and identity politics on the European continent. He distinguishes between the nationalism now emerging during the Covid-19 pandemic, versus the nationalism that arose during Europe's refugee crisis in 2015.
However, he says Europe must Cambodia WhatsApp Number Data learn that ethnic and cultural diversity is the defining feature of the century. XXI. And that everything has to do with the way of defining what is called "people". Protectionism, isolationism and nativism are growing phenomena in many democracies, including the United States. How should democracies best respond to them? The identity politics taking place in Eastern Europe today is in many ways a belated reaction against decades of identity-denying politics that began in 1989. Excessive uniqueness is a natural reaction to excessive marketing. of the "innocence" of universalism. Read also: Behind the scenes and billions, the new and the unsaid in the interview of Arben Ahmetaj Statements of Ahmetaj/DP: Rama's former right-hand man proved our accusations. Unmasked SPAK! This is the reason why populists everywhere describe universalism as a kind of peculiarity of the rich.
The initial reluctance of former communist countries to join the liberal West in 1989 stemmed at least as much from nationalist resentment of Moscow's 40-year hegemony as from a deep commitment to liberal values and institutions. The slogan of the anti-communist movement in Poland prior to 1989 was "Wolność i słodnośćność" (Freedom and independence), and the latter referred to independence from Moscow. Unlike Western Europe in 1945, in Eastern Europe in 1989, the nationalists were not the defeated party, but part of the coalition that had overthrown the Communists. The most interesting question is not why nationalism has returned, but where it hid in the 1990s and early 2000s.
However, he says Europe must Cambodia WhatsApp Number Data learn that ethnic and cultural diversity is the defining feature of the century. XXI. And that everything has to do with the way of defining what is called "people". Protectionism, isolationism and nativism are growing phenomena in many democracies, including the United States. How should democracies best respond to them? The identity politics taking place in Eastern Europe today is in many ways a belated reaction against decades of identity-denying politics that began in 1989. Excessive uniqueness is a natural reaction to excessive marketing. of the "innocence" of universalism. Read also: Behind the scenes and billions, the new and the unsaid in the interview of Arben Ahmetaj Statements of Ahmetaj/DP: Rama's former right-hand man proved our accusations. Unmasked SPAK! This is the reason why populists everywhere describe universalism as a kind of peculiarity of the rich.
The initial reluctance of former communist countries to join the liberal West in 1989 stemmed at least as much from nationalist resentment of Moscow's 40-year hegemony as from a deep commitment to liberal values and institutions. The slogan of the anti-communist movement in Poland prior to 1989 was "Wolność i słodnośćność" (Freedom and independence), and the latter referred to independence from Moscow. Unlike Western Europe in 1945, in Eastern Europe in 1989, the nationalists were not the defeated party, but part of the coalition that had overthrown the Communists. The most interesting question is not why nationalism has returned, but where it hid in the 1990s and early 2000s.